<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#8220;The best chapter in the book so far.&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://andreaskluth.org/2010/01/03/the-best-chapter-in-the-book-so-far/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://andreaskluth.org/2010/01/03/the-best-chapter-in-the-book-so-far/</link>
	<description>What History’s Greatest Military Strategist Can Teach Us About Success And Failure</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2012 01:01:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Man of Roma</title>
		<link>http://andreaskluth.org/2010/01/03/the-best-chapter-in-the-book-so-far/#comment-4525</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Man of Roma]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2010 15:24:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://andreaskluth.org/?p=4025#comment-4525</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;em&gt;Some famous authors now write only for the web? Such as who? I’m quite intrigued.&lt;/em&gt;

2-3 got sooo religious about it but I forgot their names. Here 3 spurious categories, I&#039;m sorry:

1) Known authors whose works are transferred to - and/or directly created for - the web. 
Paulo Coelho, a great example. Of course now he&#039;s terribly rich but he started writing first on Facebook, and later printed the result; he also spread his printed books via p2p file sharing, pirated his own books on *&lt;a href=&quot;http://paulocoelhoblog.com/pirate-coelho/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Pirate Coelho&lt;/a&gt;*, was thus caught by Jane Friedman, head of HarperCollins, then he asked readers to translate his books (copywriting going to translators): one Russian translation sold millions of copies, I think. More info *&lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paulo_Coelho#File_Sharing&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;*. 

2) web stuff later printed. Banal: blogs etc. can become books, we all know. But, in between: 

3) the self-publishing (on both web and print) by known and unknown poets, novelists, journalists etc.
*&lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stephen_Clarke_%28writer%29&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Stephen Clarke&#039;s&lt;/a&gt;* (and his &lt;em&gt;A Year In The Merde&lt;/em&gt;) case is an adorable example. And his book, despite its subtle ... malice towards the French (I lack words), made me roll on the floor laughing.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Some famous authors now write only for the web? Such as who? I’m quite intrigued.</em></p>
<p>2-3 got sooo religious about it but I forgot their names. Here 3 spurious categories, I&#8217;m sorry:</p>
<p>1) Known authors whose works are transferred to &#8211; and/or directly created for &#8211; the web.<br />
Paulo Coelho, a great example. Of course now he&#8217;s terribly rich but he started writing first on Facebook, and later printed the result; he also spread his printed books via p2p file sharing, pirated his own books on *<a href="http://paulocoelhoblog.com/pirate-coelho/" rel="nofollow">Pirate Coelho</a>*, was thus caught by Jane Friedman, head of HarperCollins, then he asked readers to translate his books (copywriting going to translators): one Russian translation sold millions of copies, I think. More info *<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paulo_Coelho#File_Sharing" rel="nofollow">here</a>*. </p>
<p>2) web stuff later printed. Banal: blogs etc. can become books, we all know. But, in between: </p>
<p>3) the self-publishing (on both web and print) by known and unknown poets, novelists, journalists etc.<br />
*<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stephen_Clarke_%28writer%29" rel="nofollow">Stephen Clarke&#8217;s</a>* (and his <em>A Year In The Merde</em>) case is an adorable example. And his book, despite its subtle &#8230; malice towards the French (I lack words), made me roll on the floor laughing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Is blogging cannibalising your writing? &#171; Solid gold creativity</title>
		<link>http://andreaskluth.org/2010/01/03/the-best-chapter-in-the-book-so-far/#comment-4517</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Is blogging cannibalising your writing? &#171; Solid gold creativity]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2010 01:25:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://andreaskluth.org/?p=4025#comment-4517</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] is not an uncommon concern for bloggers.  Just the other day, for example, on The Hannibal Blog, a commentor with his own excellent blog, the Man of Roma, touched on the issue.  In his case, he appeared to resolve the question &#8220;should I care?&#8221; in the [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] is not an uncommon concern for bloggers.  Just the other day, for example, on The Hannibal Blog, a commentor with his own excellent blog, the Man of Roma, touched on the issue.  In his case, he appeared to resolve the question &#8220;should I care?&#8221; in the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: andreaskluth</title>
		<link>http://andreaskluth.org/2010/01/03/the-best-chapter-in-the-book-so-far/#comment-4508</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[andreaskluth]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2010 03:40:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://andreaskluth.org/?p=4025#comment-4508</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Some famous authors now write only for the web? Such as who? I&#039;m quite intrigued. 

I suspect your journey resembles that of many bloggers. I can&#039;t help but note that &quot;Wordpress&quot; is meant to remind us of Gutenberg&#039;s printing press. As in: We each have what only a few people once had. We are each author and publisher in one now. 

What a great thing this is about the modern world.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some famous authors now write only for the web? Such as who? I&#8217;m quite intrigued. </p>
<p>I suspect your journey resembles that of many bloggers. I can&#8217;t help but note that &#8220;WordPress&#8221; is meant to remind us of Gutenberg&#8217;s printing press. As in: We each have what only a few people once had. We are each author and publisher in one now. </p>
<p>What a great thing this is about the modern world.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Man of Roma</title>
		<link>http://andreaskluth.org/2010/01/03/the-best-chapter-in-the-book-so-far/#comment-4505</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Man of Roma]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2010 22:28:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://andreaskluth.org/?p=4025#comment-4505</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Wanted to talk about Syracuse but was captured by the joy (and torment) of creation. 

I understand this torment and people desiring to write books - I had creative ambitions all my life! But writing books, it hasn’t come to my mind (unless an offer arrives I can’t refuse, which will not, I’m seasoned enough to know.)

So my book &#039;is&#039; my blog. Its topic &quot;a man-of-the-street&#039;s (of Rome) take on Roman-ness&quot;. 

My ambition and torment is the &lt;i&gt;quality&lt;/i&gt; of my research, more than one chapter (or post) being better or worse [not every chapter in a book can be good, Andreas]

Which is no big deal so far, this quality of mine, but I&#039;ll make it better. I am very determined. What people think of it counts of course, but my personal expectations (and severity) count much more (unfortunately - I am never satisfied.)

[btw guys, did you know some famous authors now write only for the Web?] 

As for a public, I have blog buds with millions of hits (&lt;a href=&quot;http://nitawriter.wordpress.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;*Nita*&lt;/a&gt;, for example) while I have reached 200,000 in a little more than 2 years - which means at least 50,000 people have read my &#039;online book&#039;. More than I had ever expected, so I am glad of my public and I especially love the discussions &amp; friendships that arise with time.

Ok, am I sincere? Don&#039;t I care about becoming a known author? I think I don&#039;t, and the reason I&#039;m sure is THIS. 

My life dream was not that of becoming a writer. My life dream was that of becoming a musician. And since I have failed, a writer is not that important to me.

A dilettante philosopher and historian instead much more, thanks to people who helped me find new motives.

______

Last time I talk about myself, promise Andreas. Next time Syracuse, and following a hero thing I hope can be of help. I read many of your posts on heroes.

Ciao, 
ciao, 
miao,
maramao.

:-)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wanted to talk about Syracuse but was captured by the joy (and torment) of creation. </p>
<p>I understand this torment and people desiring to write books &#8211; I had creative ambitions all my life! But writing books, it hasn’t come to my mind (unless an offer arrives I can’t refuse, which will not, I’m seasoned enough to know.)</p>
<p>So my book &#8216;is&#8217; my blog. Its topic &#8220;a man-of-the-street&#8217;s (of Rome) take on Roman-ness&#8221;. </p>
<p>My ambition and torment is the <i>quality</i> of my research, more than one chapter (or post) being better or worse [not every chapter in a book can be good, Andreas]</p>
<p>Which is no big deal so far, this quality of mine, but I&#8217;ll make it better. I am very determined. What people think of it counts of course, but my personal expectations (and severity) count much more (unfortunately &#8211; I am never satisfied.)</p>
<p>[btw guys, did you know some famous authors now write only for the Web?] </p>
<p>As for a public, I have blog buds with millions of hits (<a href="http://nitawriter.wordpress.com/" rel="nofollow">*Nita*</a>, for example) while I have reached 200,000 in a little more than 2 years &#8211; which means at least 50,000 people have read my &#8216;online book&#8217;. More than I had ever expected, so I am glad of my public and I especially love the discussions &amp; friendships that arise with time.</p>
<p>Ok, am I sincere? Don&#8217;t I care about becoming a known author? I think I don&#8217;t, and the reason I&#8217;m sure is THIS. </p>
<p>My life dream was not that of becoming a writer. My life dream was that of becoming a musician. And since I have failed, a writer is not that important to me.</p>
<p>A dilettante philosopher and historian instead much more, thanks to people who helped me find new motives.</p>
<p>______</p>
<p>Last time I talk about myself, promise Andreas. Next time Syracuse, and following a hero thing I hope can be of help. I read many of your posts on heroes.</p>
<p>Ciao,<br />
ciao,<br />
miao,<br />
maramao.<br />
 <img src='http://s0.wp.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter G</title>
		<link>http://andreaskluth.org/2010/01/03/the-best-chapter-in-the-book-so-far/#comment-4504</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter G]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2010 20:30:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://andreaskluth.org/?p=4025#comment-4504</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sometimes an editor&#039;s comment is just a cigar.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sometimes an editor&#8217;s comment is just a cigar.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: andreaskluth</title>
		<link>http://andreaskluth.org/2010/01/03/the-best-chapter-in-the-book-so-far/#comment-4502</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[andreaskluth]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2010 16:59:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://andreaskluth.org/?p=4025#comment-4502</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Eventually I&#039;ll ask him. But what do you want him to say? &quot;All 14 chapters are the best in the book.&quot; ;)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Eventually I&#8217;ll ask him. But what do you want him to say? &#8220;All 14 chapters are the best in the book.&#8221; <img src='http://s1.wp.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: andreaskluth</title>
		<link>http://andreaskluth.org/2010/01/03/the-best-chapter-in-the-book-so-far/#comment-4501</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[andreaskluth]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2010 16:58:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://andreaskluth.org/?p=4025#comment-4501</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here is what I think about that: Actually, on second thought.... Wait, come to think of it...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here is what I think about that: Actually, on second thought&#8230;. Wait, come to think of it&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: andreaskluth</title>
		<link>http://andreaskluth.org/2010/01/03/the-best-chapter-in-the-book-so-far/#comment-4500</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[andreaskluth]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2010 16:57:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://andreaskluth.org/?p=4025#comment-4500</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Oh yes. Speaking just for mine.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh yes. Speaking just for mine.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cheri</title>
		<link>http://andreaskluth.org/2010/01/03/the-best-chapter-in-the-book-so-far/#comment-4499</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cheri]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2010 16:31:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://andreaskluth.org/?p=4025#comment-4499</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[:D
Thank you Dr. Freud.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> <img src='http://s0.wp.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' /><br />
Thank you Dr. Freud.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Douglas</title>
		<link>http://andreaskluth.org/2010/01/03/the-best-chapter-in-the-book-so-far/#comment-4498</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Douglas]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2010 15:19:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://andreaskluth.org/?p=4025#comment-4498</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I forgot to add &quot;Also a bit devious.&quot;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I forgot to add &#8220;Also a bit devious.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phil</title>
		<link>http://andreaskluth.org/2010/01/03/the-best-chapter-in-the-book-so-far/#comment-4496</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Phil]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2010 09:35:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://andreaskluth.org/?p=4025#comment-4496</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Is your editor damning with faint praise? I do hope not.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is your editor damning with faint praise? I do hope not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nadia Quiros</title>
		<link>http://andreaskluth.org/2010/01/03/the-best-chapter-in-the-book-so-far/#comment-4493</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[nadia Quiros]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2010 05:51:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://andreaskluth.org/?p=4025#comment-4493</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well put, both above comments! Laughed out loud, just had to actually write that out instead of &quot;LOL.&quot;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well put, both above comments! Laughed out loud, just had to actually write that out instead of &#8220;LOL.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter G</title>
		<link>http://andreaskluth.org/2010/01/03/the-best-chapter-in-the-book-so-far/#comment-4487</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter G]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2010 03:57:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://andreaskluth.org/?p=4025#comment-4487</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Cheri, yours is one of the best responses so far.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cheri, yours is one of the best responses so far.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cheri</title>
		<link>http://andreaskluth.org/2010/01/03/the-best-chapter-in-the-book-so-far/#comment-4486</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cheri]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2010 03:54:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://andreaskluth.org/?p=4025#comment-4486</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I abandoned a post I was assiduously working on today about a book I saw last weekend in a the psychology section of &lt;i&gt;Barnes and Noble&lt;/i&gt; entitled &lt;i&gt;Women Who Think Too Much: How to Break Free of Overthinking and Reclaim Your Life.&lt;/i&gt;

I spent too much time working and reworking my language and then began to wonder about my ability to write, to think, to be.

Your post comforted me.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I abandoned a post I was assiduously working on today about a book I saw last weekend in a the psychology section of <i>Barnes and Noble</i> entitled <i>Women Who Think Too Much: How to Break Free of Overthinking and Reclaim Your Life.</i></p>
<p>I spent too much time working and reworking my language and then began to wonder about my ability to write, to think, to be.</p>
<p>Your post comforted me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Douglas</title>
		<link>http://andreaskluth.org/2010/01/03/the-best-chapter-in-the-book-so-far/#comment-4485</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Douglas]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2010 03:38:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://andreaskluth.org/?p=4025#comment-4485</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The human mind is a strange and wondrous thing.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The human mind is a strange and wondrous thing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

